Sunday, November 08, 2009

Book Review: Confessions of a Radical Industrial

Many books offer environmental understanding and perspective, but few of them offer a genuine path that will turn that perspective into tangible change. This is exactly what Confessions of a Radical Industrialist, the new book by Ray Anderson, attempts to do.

In 1973, Ray Anderson founded Interface, a company he built into the world's largest manufacturer of modular carpets. But in 1994, he charted a new course for his industrial, petroleum based company after reading Paul Hawken's The Ecology of Commerce. In the abrupt, soul shattering understanding that followed, Ray Anderson launched a new transformative direction for Interface - to become not only sustainable, but restorative.

That year, he delivered a new vision to his management team that would ultimately make Interface a world leader in sustainability and environmental responsibility:

"So here's the vision (I) share with you today: I want Interface to be the first name in industrial ecology, and here's my challenge to you. I want to know how long it's going to take us to get there. Then, I want t o know what we'll need to do to push that envelope and make Interface a restorative enterprise. To put back more than we take from the earth and to do good for the earth, not just no harm. How do we leave the world better with every square yard of carpet we make and sell?"

That question was eventually answered by Interface's Mission Zero, a formalized corporate vision to make the company fully sustainable by the year 2020. They have come along way towards that goal. Over the past 15 years when governments and industry in the United States insisted that the 7% reduction in greenhouse gases called for by the Kyoto Protocol would destroy the economy, Interface lowered theirs by 71% while increasing sales by two thirds and doubling earnings.

The environmental success of Interface did not stop there. They have also increased renewable energy use from 0 to 28%, water use has decreased by 72% overall, and the recycled content of their carpets has gone from 0.5% to 24%. These are just a few examples of Interface's transformation to date.

In Confessions of a Radical Industrialist, Ray Anderson details this success and outlines a pathway that other corporate leaders can follow in transforming their organizations. He shares 7 faces of sustainability that Interface embraced in guiding their efforts to eliminate waste, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build environmental responsibility into every aspect of their operations and corporate culture.

Those faces are:
  1. Moving towards zero waste
  2. Eliminating emissions or rendering them benign
  3. Increasing efficiency and renewable energy
  4. Closed loop recycling and turning waste into raw material
  5. Making transport systems resource efficient
  6. Sensitizing employees, suppliers and communities to environmental responsibility and opportunity
  7. Redesigning commerce to assess accurate costs, set real prices and maximize resource efficiency

Confessions follows Interfaces success and best practices through each of these faces, while weaving in first hand stories of the employees and innovators who created these solutions - emphasizing the value of human creativity and innovation, and the need to harness these gifts in any true vision of sustainability.

But the book is more than platitudes or idealism. By his own admission Ray Anderson is a competitive capitalist with an eye pinned keenly on the bottom line and ultimate success of his business. And this, I'd argue, is a primary reason for his success. In Confessions, he has supplied a pragmatic roadmap for continuous environmental improvement that is anchored in the constraints faced by organizations in the real world. It is a bottom line approach that should gain the attention of industrialists throughout the developed word facing increasing commodity and energy costs and the financial uncertainty of the current global economy. A recurring them throughout the book is the advantage Interface now enjoys in the market, thanks to the aggressive pursuit of efficiency and waste reduction that sustainability has led to.

But despite the authors industrial career, the book goes well beyond the typical line between industry versus environment and points towards a more fundamental relationship, one that accurately places human endeavour within the context of the natural world. It is not an indictment against industry, but instead points to its true and sustainable place, as a system that operates through the gifts, and limits of the natural world. Anderson calls this "thinking in the round" in reference to the perfectly efficient and renewable closed circle that all natural systems operate within.

At the book's heart is a deep faith that, because human beings are an extension of the environment itself, our best enterprises, values, and talents can find alignment and synergy with the natural laws of sustainability. Readers may respond, "This is the view of one person, in one small corner of the industrial world. How does this apply to global environmental problems facing our global society?" I'll let Mr. Anderson answer in his own words,

I am convinced that having a sustainable society for the indefinite future depends totally and absolutely on the vast, ethically driven redesign of the industrial system about which I have written, triggered by an equally vast mind-shift. But - and this is the hard part - that shift must happen one mind at a time, one organization at a time, one technology at a time, one building, one company, one university curriculum, one community, one region, one industry at a time, one product at a time until we look around one day and see that there is a new norm at work, and that the entire system has been transformed.

Confessions reminds us that while the problems facing the environment are large, the seeds of change are always the same. They encompass the dedicated actions of each individual person doing what they can to improve the world for the better.

However, the magnitude of each person's responsibility is also proportionate to the amount of impact they are responsible for creating. Ray Anderson stands apart not for his environmental awareness, but because he took the rare approach of both confronting the full impact of his petroleum based business and accepting a level of responsibility that was equal to this impact.

Confessions of a Radical Industrialist, and the success of Interface's environmental efforts to date, are both testament to this acknowledgment of responsibility. Interface's journey towards complete sustainability for Interface is still being written, but with luck and hope we can look forward to reading about those last steps of the journey in Ray Anderson's next book.


For more information visit the Interface website, Mission Zero, or see Ray Anderson speak on TED.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Nobel Scientists Agree - Stop Soot Now!

Last week, Ecojustice launched stopsoot.ca - a video campaign that calls on the Canadian government to stop the number two cause of global warming, black carbon emissions otherwise known as soot.

That call to action is also being echoed by the man who one a Nobel prize for sounding the alarm about the ozone layer - Dr Mario Molina. Dr. Molina and other leaders at the National Academy of Sciences have stated that reducing soot (black carbon) could slow global warming by as much as two decades and help give the world time to reduce greenhouse gas pollution and stabilize our warming climate.

Researchers consider black carbon (soot) an ideal target for achieving quick mitigation because it only remains in the atmosphere a few days to a few weeks and can be reduced by expanding the use of diesel particulate filters for
vehicles and clean-burning or solar cookstoves to replace those burning
dung and wood. With indoor air pollution killing 1.6 million people a year, global action to cut soot emissions would reap major benefits for both public health and climate.

"If we reduce black carbon emissions worldwide by 50 percent by fully deploying all available emissions-control technologies, we could delay the warming effects of CO2 by one to two decades and at the same time greatly improve the health of those living in heavily polluted regions," said Dr. Ramanathan.

The report wants efforts to reduce C02 to be complimented by strategies that can have an immediate impact in the atmosphere like stopping soot and reducing other non-CO2 climate change agents. I agree.

Visit stopsoot.ca to see the video and send a letter to Stephen Harper calling for swift action on soot.


cross posted at Ecojustice

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Beds ARE Burning, Act Now

I always thought Midnight Oil's hit single had "climate change theme song" written all over it. Here it is.....



Courtesy dkomm and TckTckTck.

Monday, August 24, 2009

US Seismic Ship Heading to Canadian Waters

There was a major development over the weekend in the case of a US research vessel, RV Marcus Langseth, seeking to conduct seismic testing in Canada's first marine protected area.
Environmentalists are fuming after learning the federal government has given permission to a U.S. research ship to begin controversial seismic testing in Canadian waters, despite an ongoing court challenge.

"The issue at stake here is the fact that by issuing this clearance permit for the vessel, they are valuing American interests above that of the Canadian environment and Canadian species at risk," said spokesman Kori Brus. "They've given no reason; they've simply done it."

A foreign affairs spokesman on Sunday would not confirm the ship has been given clearance to begin its test program. He refused to comment, saying the issue was before the courts.

While the Canadian government is refusing to comment on a decision that threatens blue whales and the integrity of the nation's first marine protected area, environmentalists ARE fuming - and rightfully so. The federal government's own documents demonstrate a full awareness of the impacts this testing will have on endangered whales, and they have allowed this research to go forward regardless of the best science available.

We're in court tomorrow working to have the permit issued to the US vessel stayed. More to come then.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Health Care Lies Go International - Have Your Say

Compassionate human being and informed citizens the world over are looking on at the current health care 'debate' in the US (and I use the term debate in the loosest way possible) with something akin to slack jawed disbelief.

The American health care system - if you could call whatever is going on down there a system at all - ranks as the world's most expensive while delivering close to the worst service in the developed world and insurance/pharmaceutical industry interests are working overtime to scare Americans into the ill-founded belief that health care coverage is somehow bad for them.

Canada has been a prominent target in that fearmongering, but now Canadians have a chance to voice their views. Avaaz.org has launched a petition aimed at US legislators that debunks the lies being told about the Canadian system, and urges them to make their decisions based on facts.

Visit Avaaz to add you name. They're fast approaching their goal of 50,000 signatures, and every voice counts.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Lawsuit Against US Seismic Blasting in Canadian Waters

Ecojustice is suing the federal government to stop an American research vessel from conducting seismic blasting in a Canadian waters. The area in question? The Endeavour Hydrothermal Vents, Canada's first officially designated marine protected area and a known habitat of endangered blue whales and fin whales.

“A marine protected area is a marine protected area because its supposed to be off limits to harmful activity. And its just completely inappropriate that intrusive or harmful research would happen there,” said Ecojustice lawyer, Lara Tessaro.

According to Ecojustice, the seismic blasts at 180 decibels every 2 or 3 minutes would cause intense acoustic disturbance for the marine animals in the area, most specifically the blue whales in the area.


Ecojustice is scheduled for to be in court on the issue tomorrow. See the media release for more.

Monday, August 10, 2009

The Most Intelligent Emissions Target, Period

Courtesy of the @tcktcktck, this is the most socially responsible, fair and intelligent answer to international emissions targets there is. India's Minister of State for Environment and Forests, Jairam Rames, has laid out India's expectations for at the latest round of climate discussion in Bonn, Germany. Specifically, he:

.....reiterated India’s position on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities – a principle that the entire global community has enshrined in UNFCCC concluded in 1992 at the historic Rio Summit. He said that India was for fixing per capita emission limits of countries. He said that India’s per capita emission level was low at 1.2 tonne of carbon dioxide as compared to 20.6 tonne in US, 20 tonne in Canada, 9.8 tonne in UK and Germany, 9.9 tonne in Japan. He said that under circumstances (sic) India was not committed to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and have already assured that its per capita emission would never exceed that of the developed countries. The developing countries have the right to take up development projects to fight poverty , he said.

And this is the entire point. The United States has been prominent through the years attempting to unload it's responsibilities on developing nations like China and India, but let's be clear. The US has a third the population of China or India and it produces more than double the per capita emissions of other developed nations like the UK and Japan. To date, they have fallen short on every side of the equation, and this points to the heart of the matter.

The entire issue of 'who needs to cut emissions and how much' is a red herring that has disabled legitimate action for years. We know the atmospheric level of carbon that needs to be maintained. Divide that by population and you have your per capita figure. Those countries falling under it (the developing world) have room to grow. Those of us above it are looking more and more like the morbidly obese heading for a tenth helping at the buffet table.

The math couldn't be more clear, from every perspective.